SAMPLE ESSAYS
INTRODUCTION
There are two writing tasks on the TOEFL iBT. The first is an
integrated task that requires test takers to read, listen, and
then write in response to what they have read and heard. The
second is an independent task where test takers support an
opinion on a topic.
Below is an example of each type, responses at each score level,
with annotations that explain why the response received its
score. Examples that earned a score of zero (0) are not included.
All the samples are reproduced with original syntax, spelling,
and punctuation!!! Please, review these responses and the writing
rubrics describing the characteristics of responses at each level
for both independent and integrated writing tasks.
TASK 1: READING-LISTENING-WRITING
INTEGRATED TASK
Via computer delivery, examinees are given some time to read and
take notes if they wish about a reading passage. They then listen
to a lecture and are allowed to take notes during the lecture.
The reading passage then reappears along with a question and
examinees are given 20 minutes to key in their responses.
The reading passage remains present and examinees can use their
notes. Examinees are told in the instructions in advance of this
writing task
- that their response will be evaluated for content (accuracy and completeness), and for appropriate use of language and sentence structure;
- that their response should show that they understand the major ideas and important information in the passage and lecture, and their relationship; and
- that "This writing task is not asking for your opinion; it is asking you to give an answer, in an organized and well-written way, based on the information in the passage you read and short lecture you heard."
- that typically an effective response would be 150-225 words.
READING
First examinees see the following reading passage on their
computer screen for three minutes:
In many organizations, perhaps the best
way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of
people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project
offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people has a
wider range of knowledge, expertise, and skills than any single
individual is likely to possess. Also, because of the numbers of
people involved and the greater resources they possess, a group
can work more quickly in response to the task assigned to it and
can come up with highly creative solutions to problems and
issues. Sometimes these creative solutions come about because a
group is more likely to make risky decisions that an individual
might not undertake. This is because the group spreads
responsibility for a decision to all the members and thus no
single individual can be held accountable if the decision turns
out to be wrong.
Taking part in a group process can be very rewarding for members
of the team. Team members who have a voice in making a decision
will no doubt feel better about carrying out the work that is
entailed by that decision than they might doing work that is
imposed on them by others. Also, the individual team member has a
much better chance to "shine," to get his or her contributions
and ideas not only recognized but recognized as highly
significant, because a team's overall results can be more
far-reaching and have greater impact than what might have
otherwise been possible for the person to accomplish or
contribute working alone.
READING
A narrator then says, "Now listen to
part of a lecture on the topic you just read about."
Then examinees listen to and can take notes on the following
lecture, the script of which is given below.
YOU SEE:
A picture of a male professor standing in front of a class.
YOU LISTEN TO:
(Professor) Now I want to tell you about
what one company found when it decided that it would turn over
some of its new projects to teams of people, and make the team
responsible for planning the projects and getting the work done.
After about six months, the company took a look at how well the
teams performed.
On virtually every team, some members got almost a "free ride"
... they didn't contribute much at all, but if their team did a
good job, they nevertheless benefited from the recognition the
team got. And what about group members who worked especially well
and who provided a lot of insight on problems and issues? Well
... the recognition for a job well done went to the group as a
whole, no names were named. So it won't surprise you to learn
that when the real contributors were asked how they felt about
the group process, their attitude was just the opposite of what
the reading predicts.
Another finding was that some projects just didn't move very
quickly. Why? Because it took so long to reach consensus ... it
took many, many meetings to build the agreement among group
members about how they would move the project along. On the other
hand, there were other instances where one or two people managed
to become very influential over what their group did. Sometimes
when those influencers said "That will never work" about an idea
the group was developing, the idea was quickly dropped instead of
being further discussed. And then there was another occasion when
a couple influencers convinced the group that a plan of theirs
was "highly creative." And even though some members tried to warn
the rest of the group that the project was moving in directions
that might not work, they were basically ignored by other group
members. Can you guess the ending to this story? When the project
failed, the blame was placed on all the members of the
group.
READING
The reading passage then reappears and the following directions
and question appear on the screen:
YOU READ:
You have 20 minutes to plan and write
your response. Your response will be judged on the basis of the
quality of your writing and on how well your response presents
the points in the lecture and their relationship to the reading
passage. Typically, an effective response will be 150 to 225
words.
YOU RESPOND TO:
Summarize the points made in the lecture
you just heard, explaining how they cast doubt on points made in
the reading.
SAMPLE RESPONSES:
SCORE LEVEL 5:
The lecturer talks about research
conducted by a firm that used the group system to handle their
work. He says that the theory stated in the passage was very
different and somewhat inaccurate when compared to what happened
for real.
First, some members got free rides. That is, some didn't work
hard but gotrecognition for the success nontheless. This also
indicates that people who worked hard was not given recognition
they should have got. In other words, they weren't given the
oppotunity to "shine". This derectly contradicts what the passage
indicates.
Second, groups were slow in progress. The passage says that
groups are nore responsive than individuals because of the number
of people involved and their aggregated resources. However, the
speaker talks about how the firm found out that groups were
slower than individuals in dicision making. Groups needed more
time for meetings, which are neccesary procceedures in decision
making. This was another part where experience contradicted
theory.
Third, influetial people might emerge, and lead the group towards
glory or failure. If the influent people are going in the right
direction there would be no problem. But in cases where they go
in the wrong direction, there is nobody that has enough influence
to counter the decision made. In other words, the group might
turn into a dictatorship, with the influential party as the
leader, and might be less flexible in thinking. They might become
one-sided, and thus fail to succeed.
RATING ANNOTATION:
Once you read past what seem to be the results of poor typing,
this response does an excellent job of presenting the points
about the contribution and recognition of group members as well
as about speed of group decisions. The final paragraph contains
one noticeable error ("influent"), which is then used correctly
two sentences later ("influential"). Overall, this is a
successful response and scored within (though perhaps not at the
top of) level 5.
SCORE LEVEL 4:
The lecture that followed the paragraph
on the team work in organizations, gave some negative views of
the team work itself.
Firstly, though it was said in the paragraph that the whole team
idea would probably be faster than the individual work, it was
said in the lecture just the opposite: it could actually be a lot
slower. That is because team members would sometimes take more
time than needed just to reach the same conclussions, or just
even to simply decide where to go from certain point to the next
on.
Secondly, paragraph suggests that by doing work as a team might
give you an "edge", the lecture suggests that that might also be
a negative thing as well. The people who made themselves leaders
in the group may just be wrong in certain decisions, or just
simple thing something is so creative, when in reality it is not
and it would not work, but the rest of the people would
nevertheless still follow them, and end up not doing well at
all.
And lastly, paragraph says that everyone feels responsible for
their own part, and all together they are all more effective as a
team. The lecture suggests quite the opposite in this case as
well. It suggests that some team members are there only for the
"free ride", and they don't do much of anything to contribute,
but still get the credit as a whole.
RATING ANNOTATION:
This response does well at attempting to interweave the points
from the passage and lecture and does a good job of discussing
the reaching of consensus and the issue of the "free ride." But
the second body paragraph does not communicate the issue of the
negative effect of people who dominate the group as clearly. The
key sentence in this paragraph ("The people who made themselves
leaders in the group may just be wrong in certain decisions, or
just simple thing something is so creative, when in reality it is
not and it would not work, but the rest of the people would
nevertheless still follow them, and end up not doing well at
all") represents enough of a lapse in clarity that this response
is scored as a 4.
SCORE LEVEL 3:
The lecturer provide the opposite opinion
concerning what the article offered. The team work often bring
negative effet. As we all know superficially, team work and team
spirits are quite popular in today's business world and also the
fashionable terms.
However, the lecturer find deeper and hiding results.
Firstly, the working results of team members can't be fully
valued. For example, if a team member does nothing in the process
of team discussion, decision making and final pratice, his or her
work deliquency will not be recognized because we only emphasize
team work. Also, the real excellent and creative member's work
might be obliterated for the same reason.
Secondly, the team work might lose its value when team members
are leading by several influential people in the group. One of
the essential merits of team is to avoid the individule wrong.
But one or two influential or persuasive people will make the
team useless.
Thirdly, team work oftem become the excuse of taking
responsibillity. All in charge, nobody care.
All in all, what we should do is the fully distinguish the
advantages and disadvantages of a concept or widely used method.
That is to keep the common sense.
RATING ANNOTATION:
This response response frames the issue well. The writer
discusses the points about contributing ideas and about
influencers in somewhat error-prone or vague and non-idiomatic
language ("hiding results," "working results," and "when team
members are leading by ...influential people"). The point about
influencers drops off at making the team "useless" and does not
fully explain the reason these influencers create problems. The
final point beginning with the word "thirdly" is not fully
related to the passage and lecture, and the meaning of it is
unclear. This response illustrates many of typical features that
can cause a response to receive the score of 3.
SCORE LEVEL 2:
In a company's experement, some new
projects were planed and acomplished by different teams. Some
teams got very good results while some teams didn't. That is to
say it's not nessesary for teams to achieve more than individuals
do because some team members may only contribute a little in a
team for they may relying on the others to do the majority.
Another thing is the recognition for the achievement by the team
is for the whole team, for everyone in the team. It's not only
the dicision makers in the team feel good after successfully
finishing the project, but also every member in the team.
It is also showed in the lecture that in a team with one or two
leaders, sometimes good ideas from some team member are dropped
and ignored while sometimes they may be highly creative. In some
teams decisions were made without collecting ideas from all team
members. Then it would be hard to achieve creative solutions.
For those failed projects, blames are always given to the whole
team even though it's the leader or someone in the team who
caught the unexpected result.
RATING ANNOTATION:
Although it has the appearance of a stronger response, on close
reading this essay suffers from significant problems with
connecting ideas and misrepresenting points. For instance, the
third sentence of the first paragraph seems to be getting at a
point from the lecture ("some team members may contribute only a
little..."). However, it is couched in such a way that makes it
very unclear how it relates to the point of the task ("That is to
say it's not necessary for teams to achieve more than individuals
do because some team members may only contribute..."). In
addition, it is not clear where the information in the second
paragraph is coming from and what point the writer is trying to
make. In paragraph 3, the writer tries to make a point about
influencers, but again, it is not clear what information relates
to what. And in the final paragraph, it is clear that the writer
has misunderstood what the lecture said; the phrase "caught the
unexpected result" very much obscures the real information
presented in the lecture.
SCORE LEVEL 1:
In this lecture, the example shows only
one of the group succeed the project. Why the group will succeed
on this project it is because of few factor.
First of all, a group of people has a wider range of
knowledge,expertise,and skills than any single individual is like
to prossess, and easier to gather the information and resources
to make the work effectively.and the group will willingly to trey
sometihing is risky decision to make the project for interesting
and suceessful. it is because all the member of the group carries
the differnt responsibility for a decision, so once the decision
turn wrong, no a any individual one will be blame for the whole
responsiblity.
On the other way, the groups which are fail the project is
because they are lay on some more influence people in the
group,so even the idea is come out. Once the inflenced people say
that is no good, then the process of the idea will be drop down
immediately instead taking more further discussion! So the idea
will not be easy to settle down for a group.
The form of the group is very important, and each of the member
should be respect another and try out all the idea others had
suggested,then it will develop a huge idea and the cooperate work
environment for each other for effectively work!
RATING ANNOTATION:
The level of language used in this response is fairly low, and it
is lowest in the second paragraph, which is the only reference to
the lecture. Because the reader has difficulty gleaning meaning
from that paragraph, the response contributes little coherent
information and is therefore scored as a 1.
TASK 2: INDEPENDENT WRITING TASK -
TELLING THE TRUTH
YOU READ:
Read the question below. You have 30
minutes to plan, write, and revise your essay. Typically, an
effective essay will contain a minimum of 300 words.
YOU RESPOND TO:
Do you agree or disagree with the
following statement? Always telling the truth is the most
important consideration in any relationship. Use specific reasons
and examples to support your answer.
SAMPLE RESPONSES:
SCORE LEVEL 5:
The traditional virtue of telling the
truth in all situations is increasingly doubted by many in
today's world. Many believe that telling the truth is not always
the best policy when dealing with people. Moreover, the line of a
"truth" is becoming more and more vague. this essay will explore
the importance of telling the truth in relationships between
people.
We all understand that often the truth is offending and may not
be a very nice thing to both hear or say. lies or white lies
often have their advantages. The manipulation of white lies is
the most obvious the business world. How many times have we heard
that some product is "the finest" or "the cheapest"? How many
times have we heard that products have such and such "magical
functions"? advertising is about persuasion, and many would agree
that if a company is to tell the absolute truth about it's
products, no one would be interested in even having a look at the
products.
The same logic applies to human relationships. If your friend had
worn a newly purchased dress on her birthday and energetically
asked you if it was a worthy buy, would you freely express your
opinion that you had never seen a dress as the one she's
currently wearing? and spoil her birthday? unarguably,
hiding(entirely or particially) the truth in some situations can
be quite handy indeed. Confrontations and disputes can seemingly
be avoided.
However, there is always the risk factor of the truth emerging
sooner or later when telling an untruth. The basic trust in any
relationships(businessman/customer, friends, parents/children)
will be blotched, and would have an impact on the future
relationship between both parties. the story of the "the boy who
cried wolf" fully illustrates the consequenes of telling
untruths. no one will believe you when you're telling the truth.
your word will have no weighting.
In addition, another "bad factor" of telling untruths is that you
have absolutely no control over when the truth(of previous
untruths) will emerge. Untruths breed pain in both parties: tears
when the truth is uncovered after a period of time; fear and the
burden of sharing a "secret". In the long run, it seems that
hiding the truth is not beneficial to either party.
Everyone hates betrayal. Even if it is the trend to occasionally
hide the truth in relationships, it is strongly recommended that
not to follow that trend as the risk and the consequences of the
truth unfolded overwhelms the minimal advantages one can derive
from not telling the truth. Afterall, it is understood that
relationships are founded on "trust" which goes hand in hand with
"truth". Indeed telling the truth is the most important
consideration in any relationship between people.
Always.
SCORE LEVEL 4:
I disagree with the statement above.
Although I admit that honesty should be one of the most important
consideration in human relationship, sometimes white-lies are
neccessary not to damage the relationship.
First, it is not good to tell someone his or her faults or
defects directly. By doing so, you might feel good about telling
the truth, but it could hurt the people who will listen. It is
naturl that people make mistakes and not everyone is perfect.
Despite those shortcomings, we live together by understanding
each other and tolerate those errors as we could be the one who
makes the same mistakes next time. By being pointed out our
mistakes or things other people think abominable, such as the way
we look, the clothes we wear, the way we talk and so on, we might
hate the person who criticize us rather than being thankful or
correcting those.
Second, it is better not to tell someone serious facts that can
possibly discourage him or her. I speak this from my experience.
About one year ago, my nephew got into a terrible car accident
and the doctor said he won't be able to walk again. We were all
shocked and felt desprate. However, my other nephews decided not
to tell the fact to their mother as she could pass off or be
shocked to generate other problems of her own. I felt guilty
about not telling the truth to her, who was relieved and became
hopeful by the white-lies that her son would be okay. One year
since, my nephew is getting better and his mother has been a good
supporter. If we had told her the truth, she would have been so
desparate that she couldn't have taken good care of her son and
her own health would have been in danger.
All in all, even though honesty is obviously great virtue,
"always telling the truth" is not the key to maintaining good
human relationship. By refraining from telling the truth in
certain occasions, we prevent other people from being hurt by the
remarks.
SCORE LEVEL 3:
Telling the truth is the most important
consideration in any relationship between people once you are
going to deal with this person because you first of all must
trust in this person, second nobody likes to be treated as a
fool, and the truth makes a solid relation perdure.
Firs of all, the trust is going to keep a relation going on with
confidence and confidence is something really important and
you're going to trust in a person only once. If you lose the
trust in someone I think that you will never more be able to
trust in this person again. Will you trust a very important value
to someone that has already stolen you? I bet you won't.
Second, nobody like to be seen as a fool. It's not nice been as a
glown. It's not a good sensation to be kept in lies while there
many people who know the truth. Can you imagine the sensation of
been betrayed? How can you look at someone's face that betrayed
you? A relationship, in this way, won't be nice and trustful.
Once I saw that for a relationship be solid you must trust in
person at the point of let yourself fell back in the person arms.
I mean, you trust that the person is going to be on your back to
hold you on. It won't be possible with a person that lies to
you.
The truth means that you can't lie and if you can't lie you won't
be able to betray, once you won't be able to hide anything. If
you can't betray you're going to have a perfect relationship. The
truth is really the basis of a relationship.
As a conclusion, I think that the truth is really important in a
relationship because it gives you some safety in this
relationship, the sensation that you won't be
betrayed.
SCORE LEVEL 2:
The relationship between poeple is very
important. It is important that people have to work together to
make a better life. It is sometimes hard to keep a good relation
between people. Telling the true sometimes can make people
problem. In my opinion, I agree that people should always tell
the true to make a good relationship beteween people but in the
right time.
People should be honest to each other ever about what they are
telling. It is some time important to tell the true. The story of
a boy who take care the sheaps in the field is a good example. He
was a good boy, but one day when he thought that lying is fun put
him in a big trouble. After he lied to people, he lost his trust
made him a big problem when the wolf came. This is a good example
of how bad lying is. In the way to make a good relation, people
should tell the true whether it may not good in some situation,
but everything can be better if people learn when they should say
it in the proper time. From my experiences, I used to lost my
trust because I did not tell the true. When I was young, I wanted
many toys , but I did not have money. I stole people money and
lied about where I got the money. One day, everyone found that I
stole money and lied to everyone. No one believed me any more.
After I grow up and learn that lying is not good, so I always try
to tell the true. It made me feel a lot better than before.
However, telling the true can make prople sometimes if people
don't learn about when they should say. For example, telling the
true to women can make them lose their comfident and put men in
trouble sometimes.
In the conclusion, I agree that people should
alway tell the true to make a good relationship ;however, I think
the most important about telling the true is time. If people tell
the true in the wrong time, they can be in trouble anyway. The
key is tell the true in the appropiate time.
SCORE LEVEL 1:
yes, the truth is the most important in a
relationship because each person hope that the people that love
talk with the true. The sentimental relationship need building on
truth yet that withou this dead. The truth for bad or hard is
better that thousand of lied that i feel better.
TWE AND CBT TOEFL SAMPLE
ESSAYS
The following essays were written by TOEFL test takers during an
official TOEFL administration. Responses that represent each of
the six score points on the TWE or CBT TOEFL Scoring Guide
(writing rubrics) are provided for each topic. Examples that
earned a score of zero (0) are not included. All the samples are
reproduced with original syntax, spelling, and punctuation!!!
Please, review these responses and the Scoring Guide (see TWE /
CBT TOEFL TEST WRITING RUBRICS (SCORING STANDARDS) in Writing
Rubrics in the Library section) before composing your essay.
SAMPLE TOPIC A AND SAMPLE
ESSAYS
SAMPLE TOPIC B AND SAMPLE
ESSAYS
SAMPLE TOPIC A:
Do you agree or disagree with the
following statement? Teachers should make learning enjoyable and
fun for their students. Use specific reasons and examples to
support your opinion.
SAMPLE ESSAYS SCORED: 6
5 4 3
2 1
SCORE LEVEL 6:
I do strongly support the idea that
teachers should make learning enjoyable and fun for the students.
This I support with the following reasons.
First let us take the psychological component of a student. A
child or student will be more receptive, to anything including
studies, if the subject matter is presented in an interesting and
enjoyable manner. If not there is every likelihood that the
student will be unwilling or will reject the matter presented as
he considers studying is a burden on him.
My second point is that the present day student faces tremendous
amount of distraction such as interesting television programmes,
drugs, distractions from opposite sexes and many more. To get the
student away from all these and to get him interested in studies
there is obviously no other way than to make learning
interesting.
The present day students are also pressured with tremendous
amount of competition from other students. With this mounting
pressure on them coupled with the hugh expectation of the
parents, it will lighten the burden on the young students with a
more acceptable form of presentation that is in an enjoyable and
fun manner.
Retention is another factor that should considered important. Any
presentation which is given an interesting or enjoyable manner
can be retained well by the students. If the subject matter
presented is uninteresting then there is strong likelihood the
student will forget the subject matter presented in days or even
hours.
When presenting a subject the teacher should create a desire
amongst the student to crave for knowledge on the subject and
this can certainly be obtained if the subject matter is presented
in a fun and enjoyable manner.
It can also be said that the present day communication system is
so advanced and these are ample teaching aids and techniques to
make teaching fun and enjoyable. So why not utilise the
opportunities to the full so that the student at the receiving
end can benefit to the full.
Last but not least I wish to say that by making teaching fun and
enjoyable the life expectancy of both the students and the
teachers can be extended.
SCORE LEVEL 5:
"Teachers should make learning enjoyable
and fun for their students". I do completely agree with this
staments. I believe that there have been many studies done on
this subject, and they all indicate that if children during their
first years of schooling associate learning as enjoyable and fun
they will learn the subjects and retain more than if presented on
a dull way. The trend in learning and education appears to
support this idea.
The role of the teacher now days is more than just giving away a
number of facts for students to learn. By making learning fun and
enjoyable the student will also get motivated and probably do
some research or outside class investigation to enrich his or her
own knowledge. Some may say that this is a lot of work for the
teachers. However if you look at all the tegnology available, for
example computer educational programs, educational videos etc.;
they all try make the learning process enjoyable and fun. It is
easier for teachers to plan their classes by using such
materials. Students benefits as well since they are learning
without associating the process as been a tedious chore needed to
get a grade and pass a class.
I do believe that in the long run both students and teachers will
achive great results and a sence of a well accomplished job by
approaching leaining as an enjoyable and fun activity.
SCORE LEVEL 4:
In my point of view. I do agree that
teacher should make leaning enjoyable and fun for their students
for the following reasons.
Firstly, students may pay more attention of what the teacher
says. Instead of talking to somebody else. they may concentrate
on their work. Since the most important thing is that they are
not bored by the lesson.
Secondly, the teacher will be more welcomed by students For one
may compare a friendly, funny teacher to those boring, strict
one.
Thirdly, the lively environment of learning makes students Rave a
high spirit of learning. Students may actively participate in
class activities. Thus, through different approaches of teaching,
students may learn more or be more enjoyable.
All in all, the imperative purpose is to make students feel
learning in a relaxed way not stressing too much pressure on
them. Gradually, they will find interest in learning. Therefore,
I strongly agree that teachers should make learning enjoyable and
fun for their students.
SCORE LEVEL 3:
If my teachers make leaning enjoyable
and fun for my class. I
agree that. because I think it is a good way to make students
remember in subject and want to study in school so I am a student
in school and university long time I think I know the felling of
students when teachers teach. Some teachers are strong in
subject. They stay on time and teach all of time until finch. We
didn't have break times or time for relax. After class we are
very tired and we couldn't to remember that the teacher teach us.
We know nothing, but some teacher knows about that he tries to
teach us and have time to relax or enjoyable for example we take
together in class or have some game to play together about
subject that the teacher teachs us or have break time for drink
water. I like this way to study. I think it makes us understand
and want to study more than another way. I think I can say
intersent every students I like if teachers should make leaning
enjoyable and fun for their students. I agree.
SCORE LEVEL 2:
The teacher is imporant for school, most
students don't like them. Sometimes we can finds to that teacher
was boring. I think of teacher should make learning enjoyable and
fun for their students. because they could by means of learning
and fun get many students, another they could be better teacher
and good skill from education.
And then if teacher should make learnig ciriouses with their
students, I think this way not good for teacher: For xample the
student will be fear and dislike to the teacher. Beside they
don't like enjoy their class. maybe they cut it.
Good as well as saying the teacher is basic of education in the
countrary. In the concult I like teacher learning enjoyable and
funny and then I'll be interested with class and get many things.
That is better for me.
SCORE LEVEL 1:
Teachers should make learning enjoyable
and fun for their students. I think teachers should make learning
enjoyable and fun for their student. Do you agree or disagree
with the statement? Yes, I do. Why do I think so? Because the
teacher is teaching the students. And the student is teaching the
teachers. Of course me too. This is very impotant. It is don't
forget us!
SAMPLE TOPIC B:
Supporters of technology say that it
solves problems and makes life better. Opponents argue that
technology creates new problems that may threaten or damage the
quality of life. Using one or two examples, discuss these two
positions. Which view of technology do you support?
Why?
SAMPLE ESSAYS SCORED: 6
5 4 3
2 1
SCORE LEVEL 6:
These are several viewpoints on the
implications of technological change and advancement and such
schools of thought which considerably vary have their respective
validity. Technological change has its advantages and
disadvantages.
For one, it is true that it partly solves problems
and makes life better. At the same time, technological changes
may likely create new problems thereby threatening or damaging
quality of life. In the developing economies, for instance,
technological advantages has both its merits and demerits. The
introduction and seeming acceptability and usefulness of
computers have somehow helped increase the efficiency of several
firms. It is not only in the industrial sector that technological
change proven to be very effective. In the agricultural sector,
for example, the introduction of new technologies in increasing
production has been very effective in expanding agricultural
produce. These are just a few examples to illustrate the
advantages of technological advancement.
On the other hand, countries should be more careful on their
choice of technology since it must be noted that while certain
types of technology are adaptable to developed economies the same
type of technology may not fit the environment of developing
countries due to differing economic, social, cultural, and
political factors. For example, infrastructure improvements such
as a construction of irrigation dam in the mountains of the
Philippines where several natives reside may likely be resisted
by the population due to cultural factors. They may prefer not to
have such improvements in view of traditional values. Another
example is the pollution impact of some technological
improvements particularly in the industrial sectors.
The choice and adaptability of new technology should therefore be
carefully studied. The short, medium, and long term impact of
such technology is very important particulary for developing
economies. The benefits should always be greater than the
costs.
I am inclined to support both positions because both views have
their own validity. However, I am more convinced that
technological advancement is heilly beneficial to countries so
long as they are aware of the disadvantages of such
technology.
SCORE LEVEL 5:
Technology by definetion refers to the
improvement of the technical know how and advancement of
machinery to improve the working systems in the human society. In
a away this looks a very good idea in that mans' work would be
made much faster and less laborious. Machines which are the main
implements of technology have a major advantage to mans' ways of
life. Take for example an aeroplane, which being a product of
advance in tecnology has made all corners of the earth look like
they are only centimetres apart. It has made the means of
communication which prior to its development was very difficult
much easier and less risky. Travelling to many parts of the world
which are very many miles apart now only takes a few hours or
days where as this used to take days or even months.
On the other hand technology has created a number of new harzards
to the health of societies. The machines make life easy but also
expose people to new problems. In the example considered above
transportation has become easier by planes but these planes also
expose people to accidents which have become so numerous and clam
many lives daily. As we all know that a majority of these
machines use fuel and that to use the fuel it has to burn there
are new products which we introduced into our enviroment. These
new products include gases from automobiles which pollute the air
we breathe. These gases expose us to lung diseases, cancers and
number of new ailments which have not yet been fully
explored.
In conclusion I think that although advances in technology may
seem favorable there are alot of harzards which it introduces
into our ways of life.
SCORE LEVEL 4:
I agree with the opponents of technology
say that technology creates new problems that may threaten or
damage the quality of life. The most serious problem is the
pollution. Toxic wastes are being dumped into rivers, lakes and
even out atmosphere. Fish and other marine live cannot survive in
polluted rivers and oceans. Also, toxic gases are being produced
by cars, factories and planes. This is the main source which
causes the acid rain. Acid rain has done a great damage to the
forest that the quanlity of trees are reducing day by day. The
ozone layer - a protective layer that surrounding us in the
atmosphere is carring away by wasted chemicals. That means we are
lossing our protective layer and letting ultroviolet to pass
through. And for us, we are breathing in a lot of polluted air
which may make us ill or sometimes may cause death.
Technology may solve a lot of problems but the point is the
result of technology gives us disavantages more than avantages.
So I a on the side of the opponents.
SCORE LEVEL 3:
In my own points of view I support
technology can solve problems and makes life better. Such as
deveploment of computer. Computer helps human solves thousand of
problems espeaclly science. A lot of calculation was so complex.
It is impossible count them from normal method It should use a
very fast computer in order to compute it. Super conductor, one
of the hot technology topic. A lot of sciencists study this kind
of stuff. It is a very important stuff. If we can use it in
normal way. That is wnderful. We can easily solve the big
problem, "energy". Because super conductor has a special mental.
It can pass through the energy without lossing. It is a
Hi-technology's symbol.
But technology also created a lot of problem. Such as industary
unless thing. Human feel dizzy from then. A lot of vehicles
running on the road. Creating much CO2. Affect the earth's nature
condition Recently. The weather was so bad. Because of the CO2.
CO2 blocks the sun light. So the weather was inconsiderable.
Finally, I support technology. Because it is more
benefit.
SCORE LEVEL 2:
The main point is tecnology, and what
does tecnology, and what does tecnology do in our life, before
anything we should suggest to some tecnolgy's working way in
daily life.
Tecnology would be very useful but, in some condition for example
as a nature distribting which it would be very dangrouse, but it
could be very important in other way for better live and make the
life's things to do easier.
Supporthing tecnolgy is very important - and it would make the
useful way of using tecnology, because it needs the supporters
and investing to find more and more progress in the tecnolgy.
But sometimes tecnology makes some problem that I mantion in the
begining of essay and it would very dangrous in some ways. For
example factories trash makes some problems and makes the water
dirty and it's damage wouldn't be not quality easy.
At the end I would like to say that: supporthing of tecnolgy will
be helpful and make life easier, but tecnolgy must be very
careful to not be a danger and risky.
SCORE LEVEL 1:
Now a days, in the life the technology it
solves problems. But damage the quality of the life is very
important. Because the many people to the quality of life is very
high than the yesterday socizat. They are use or buys goods is
more good then yesterday. So the many people to need the high
quality are too many.
IMPORTANT:
There are hundreds of sample TOEFL iBT writing responses at Terra
Nova's office. You can also find many sample essays at TEST MAGIC or similar websites.
REMINDER:
All Terra Nova's students can submit their TOEFL or admission
essays for FREE checking by e-mail.